And that’s an underestimate
By Todd Miller (independent journalist)
At first, I thought I had inadvertently entered an active war zone. I was on a lonely two-lane road in southern New Mexico heading for El Paso, Texas. Off to the side of the road, hardly concealed behind some desert shrubs, I suddenly noticed what seemed to be a tank. For a second, I thought I might be seeing an apparition. When I stopped to take a picture, a soldier wearing a camouflage helmet emerged from the top of the Stryker, a 19-ton, eight-wheeled combat vehicle that was regularly used in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. He looked my way and I offered a pathetic wave. To my relief, he waved back, then settled behind what seemed to be a large surveillance display mounted atop the vehicle. With high-tech binoculars, he began to monitor the mountainous desert that stretched toward Mexico, 20 miles away, as if the enemy might appear at any moment.
That was in 2012 and, though I had already been reporting on the militarization of the U.S.-Mexican border for years, I had never seen anything like it. Barack Obama was still president, and it would be another six years before Donald Trump announced, with much fanfare, that he was essentially going to declare war at the border and send in the National Guard. (“We really haven’t done that before,” Trump told the media on April 3, “or certainly not very much before.”)
Operation Nimbus II, as the 2012 mission was called, involved 500 soldiers from Fort Bliss and Fort Hood and was a typical Joint Task Force North (JTF-N) operation. Those troops were officially there to provide the U.S. Border Patrol with “intelligence and surveillance.” Since JTF-N was tasked with supporting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on the border, its motto was “Protecting the Homeland.” However, it was also deeply involved in training soldiers for overseas military operations in ongoing U.S. wars in the Greater Middle East.
Only weeks before, 40 Alaskan-based Army airborne engineers had parachuted into nearby Fort Huachuca as if they were part of an invasion force landing in southern Arizona. That border operation (despite the dramatic arrival, all they did was begin constructing a road) “mirrors the type of mission the 40 soldiers might conduct if they were deployed to Afghanistan,” JTF-N “project organizers” told Nogales International. As JTF-N spokesman Armando Carrasco put it, “this will prepare them for future deployments, especially in the areas of current contingency operations.”
So seeing combat vehicles on the border shouldn’t have surprised me, even then. A “war” against immigrants had been declared long before Trump signed the memo to deploy 2,000-4,000 National Guard troops to the border. Indeed, there has been a continuous military presence there since 1989 and the Pentagon has played a crucial role in the historic expansion of the U.S. border security apparatus ever since.
When, however, Trump began to pound out tweets on Easter Sunday on his way to church, Americans did get a vivid glimpse of a border “battlefield” more than 30 years in the making, whose intensity could be ramped up on the merest whim. The president described the border as “getting more dangerous” because 1,000 Central Americans, including significant numbers of children, in flight from violence in their home countries, were in a “caravan” in Mexico slowly heading north on a Holy Week pilgrimage. Many of them were intending to ask for asylum at the border, as they feared for their lives back home.
Fox & Friends labeled that caravan a “small migrant army” and so set the battlefield scenario perfectly for the show’s no. 1 fan. The end result – those state National Guards caravaning south – might have been as ludicrous a response to the situation as a tank in an empty desert pointed at Mexico, but it did catch a certain reality. The border has indeed become a place where the world’s most powerful military faces off against people who represent blowback from various Washington policies and are in flight from persecution, political violence, economic hardship and increasing ecological distress. (Central America is becoming a climate change hotspot.) Yet these 21st century border “battlefields” remain hidden from the public and largely beyond discussion.
The fetish of the border
As I moved away from the Stryker that day, I wondered what that soldier was seeing through his high-tech binoculars. It’s a question that remains no less pertinent six years later, as yet more National Guard troops head for the border. Even today, such forces aren’t likely to ever see a caravan of 1,000 refugees – only (possibly) tiny groups of crossers moving through the U.S. borderlands to look for work, reunite with family or escape potentially grave harm. Such people, however, usually travel under the cover of night.
Even less likely: anyone carrying drugs into the United States. According to the Drug Enforcement Administration, the majority of illicit narcotics that cross the border into the world’s largest market (valued at approximately $100 billion per year) arrive through legal ports of entry. Least likely of all: a person designated as a “terrorist” by the U.S. government, even though that’s become the priority mission of JTF-N and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). A flood of money has, in these years, poured into border budgets for just such a counter-terrorism mission, yet no such person, not a single one, has been reported crossing the southern border since 1984. (And even that incident seems dubious.)
Indeed, the most likely thing to glimpse along that divide is evidence of the countless billions of dollars that have been spent there over the past 30 years to build the most gigantic border enforcement apparatus in U.S. history. You would be quite likely, for instance, to see armed U.S. Border Patrol agents in their green-striped vehicles. (After all, CBP, the Border Patrol’s parent outfit, is now the largest federal law enforcement agency.) You might also catch glimpses of high-tech surveillance apparatuses like aerostats, the tethered surveillance balloons brought back from American battle zones in Afghanistan that now hover over and monitor the borderlands with long-range cameras and radar.
Those binoculars wouldn’t be able to see as far as the small town of Columbus, New Mexico – the very town that Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa so famously raided in 1916 – but if they could, you might also see portions of an actual border wall, built with bipartisan support after the Secure Fence Act of 2006 passed, with votes from Democrats like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Chuck Schumer. Those 650 miles of walls and barriers cost an average of $3.9 million per mile to build and additional millions to maintain, money that went into the coffers of the military-industrial complex.
In 2011, for example, CBP granted the former Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root (a company known for its profiteering in Iraq) a three-year, $24.4 million contract for border-wall maintenance. And you can multiply that so many times over since, year after year, bigger and bigger budgets have gone into border and immigration enforcement (and so into the pockets of such corporations) with little or no discussion. In 2018, the combined budgets of CBP and Immigration and Customs Enforcement amounted to $24.3 billion, a more than 15-fold increase since the early 1990s, and a $4.7 billion jump from 2017.
So, in those desert borderlands, that soldier was really looking at a market, a profit zone. He was also viewing (and himself part of) what sociologist Timothy Dunn, author of the pioneering book The Militarization of the U.S.-Mexico Border, 1978-1992, calls the “fetishization of the border.” That Stryker – the “Cadillac of combat vehicles,” made by General Dynamics – fit the bill perfectly. The slick armored beast, which can travel at speeds up to 60 miles per hour, could track down just about anything, except the real forces that lie behind why people continually arrive at the border.
Low-intensity doctrine and the hidden battlefields
In 2006, George W. Bush’s administration sent 6,000 National Guard troops to the border during Operation Jump Start, the largest military deployment there of the modern era. Those troops, however, were meant as no more than a placeholder for a post-9/11 enforcement apparatus still to be organized. Before then, as Dunn told me in an interview, there had normally been only 300-500 soldiers in border operations at any given time, whose justification then was the War on Drugs.
That Bush deployment was, as Dunn put it, “the first to have them out there in high profile, explicitly for immigration enforcement.” Still, what those soldiers could do remained largely limited to reinforcing and supporting the U.S. Border Patrol, as has been the case ever since. As a start, the U.S. military operates under grave restrictions when it comes to either making arrests or performing searches and seizures on American soil. (There are, however, loopholes when it comes to this, which means that National Guard units under state control should be watched carefully during the Trump deployments.) What those troops can do is perform aerial and ground reconnaissance, staff observation posts and install electronic ground sensors. They can supply engineering support, help construct roads and barriers, and provide intelligence – in all, Dunn reports, 33 activities, including mobile teams to train the Border Patrol in various increasingly militarized tactics.
However, the Border Patrol, already a paramilitary organization, can take care of the arrests, searches and seizures itself. It is, in fact, the perfect example of how the Pentagon’s low-intensity conflict doctrine has operated along the border since the 1980s. That doctrine promotes coordination between the military and law enforcement with the goal of controlling potentially disruptive civilian populations. On the border, this mostly means undocumented people. This, in turn, means that the military does ever more police-like work and the Border Patrol is becoming ever more militarized.
When Bush launched Operation Jump Start, Washington was already undertaking the largest hiring surge in Border Patrol history, planning to add 6,000 new agents to the ranks in two years, part of an overall expansion that has never ended. It has, in fact, only gained momentum again in the Trump era. The Border Patrol has increased from a force of 4,000 in the early 1990s to 21,000 today. The Bush-era recruitment program particularly targeted overseas military bases. The Border Patrol, as one analyst put it, already operated like “a standing army on American soil,” and that was how it was sold to future war vets who would soon join up. To this day, veterans are still told that they will be sent to “the frontlines” to defend the homeland.
The Border Patrol not only recruits from the military and receives military training, but also uses military equipment and technology prodigiously. The monoliths of the military-industrial complex – companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Elbit Systems – have long been tailoring their technologies to homeland security operations. They are now deeply involved in the increasingly lucrative border market. As one vendor told me many years ago, “we are bringing the battlefield to the border.”
Much like the military, the Border Patrol uses radar, high-tech surveillance, complex biometric databases, and Predator B drones that fly surveillance missions across the Southwest, at the border with Canada and in the Caribbean. Such forces operate in 100 mile jurisdictions beyond U.S. international boundaries (including the coasts), places where they essentially have extra-constitutional powers. As one CBP officer told me, “we are exempt from the Fourth Amendment.” Border zones, in other words, have become zones of exception, and the DHS is the only department the federal government permits to ethnically profile people in such areas, a highly racialized form of law enforcement.
As a result of this deployment of heavily armed Border Patrol officers, building of walls and use of surveillance technologies in urban areas that traditionally had been crossing spots for the undocumented, such migrants are now forced to traverse dangerous and desolate areas of the southwestern deserts. It’s a strategy that anthropologist Jason De Leon has described as creating “a remote death scape where American necropolitics are pecked onto the bones of those we deem excludable.”
Instances of overt violence on the border, the sort that might be associated with increased militarization, sometimes make the news, as in multiple incidents in which Border Patrol officers, deputized police or even military troops have shot and killed people. Most border crossers, however, are now funneled away from the television cameras and reporters to those distant desert scapes where hidden “battles” with the elements remain unseen and so are no longer a political problem. According to Dunn, this is the low-intensity conflict doctrine at work.
Along the U.S. border with Mexico, 7,000 corpses have been found since the early 1990s; a reasonable estimate of the actual death toll is triple that number. Thousands of families still search for loved ones they fear lost in what journalist Margaret Regan has termed the Southwest “killing fields.” Recently, while I was giving a talk at a New York state college, a young man approached me, having realized that I was from Arizona. He told me that he’d last seen his mother in the desert near Nogales and asked, his eyes brimming with tears, if I had any idea how he might search for her.
Globally, since 2014 the International Organization on Migration has recorded 25,000 migrant deaths – a figure, the group writes, that “is a significant indicator of the human toll of unsafe migration, yet fails to capture the true number of people who have died or gone missing during migration.” On such hidden battlefields, the toll from the fetishization of the world’s borderlands remains unknown – and virtually ignored.
Securing the unsustainable
At a global level, the forecast for the displacement of people is only expected to rise. According to projections, when it comes to climate change alone, by 2050 there could be between 150-750 million people on the move due to sea-level rise, droughts, floods, superstorms and other ecological hazards. Former Vice President Al Gore’s former security adviser, Leon Fuerth, wrote that if global warming exceeded the 2-degree Celsius mark, “border problems” would overwhelm U.S. capabilities “beyond the possibility of control, except by drastic measures and perhaps not even then.”
At the same time, estimates suggest that, by 2030, if present trends continue, the richest one percent of people on this planet may control 64% of global wealth. In other words, what we may have is an unsustainable world managed with an iron fist. In that case, an endless process of border militarization and fortification is likely to be used to control the blowback. If the booming border and surveillance markets are any indication, the future will look as dystopian as a Stryker in the beautiful desert highlands of New Mexico – a world of mass displacements that leave the super-rich hunkered down behind their surveillance fortresses.
Pouring billions of dollars into border zones to solve political, social, economic and ecological problems is hardly a phenomenon limited to the United States. The border fetish has indeed gone global. Border walls now commonly zigzag between the Global North and South and are being built up ever more as a rhetoric – caught perfectly by the Trump administration – focusing on criminals, terrorists and drugs only ratchets up, while the huge forces that actually fuel displacement and migration remain obscured. Borders have become another way of making sure that nothing gets in the way of the sanctity of business as usual in a world that desperately needs something new.
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2014, August 21). The Constitution in the 100 mile border zone. ACLU.org. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.aclu.org/other/constitution-100-mile-border-zone
Bosque, M. del. (2015, March 2). Death on Sevenmile Road. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.texasobserver.org/human-cost-border-security-build-up/
Campbell, K. (2008, June 6). Climatic cataclysm: the foreign policy and national security implications of climate change. Brookings Institution Press.
Castellano, J., González, D., & O’Dell, R. (2017, December 14). “Mass disaster” grows at the U.S.-Mexico border, but Washington doesn’t seem to care. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2017/12/14/investigation-border-patrol-undercounts-deaths-border-crossing-migrants/933689001/
Clark, J. (2012, January 24). Military engineers dig in to support Border Patrol. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.nogalesinternational.com/news/military-engineers-dig-in-to-support-border-patrol/article_9661a732-46a0-11e1-88a9-001871e3ce6c.html
Draper, R. (1997, August). Soldiers of misfortune. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/soldiers-of-misfortune-2/
Gillison, D. (2014, January 24). Feds accuse KBR of war profiteering, again. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://100r.org/2014/01/feds-accuse-kbr-of-war-profiteering-again/
Gittleson, B. (2018, April 1). Trump warns of migrant caravan following Fox News report, but organizers say reality far from their portrayal. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://abcnews.go.com/International/trump-warns-migrant-caravan-fox-news-report-organizers/story?id=54162057
GovTrack. (2006, September 29). H.R. 6061 (109th): Secure Fence Act of 2006. Govtrack.us. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/109-2006/s262
Guarnieri, G. (2017, December 21). Trump tweets “Fox & Friends” is most influential TV show. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-fox-friends-influential-755116
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2017, September 12). Fatal journeys volume 3 part 2: improving data on missing migrants. Publications.IOM.int. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://publications.iom.int/books/fatal-journeys-volume-3-part-2-improving-data-missing-migrants
Joint Task Force North (JTF-N). (n.d.). About us. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.jtfn.northcom.mil/about-us/
Joint Task Force North (JTF-N). (n.d.). Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.jtfn.northcom.mil/
Kiely, E. (2017, August 31). Fact check: will President Trump’s border wall stop drug smuggling? Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/31/fact-check-president-trump-border-wall-drug-smuggling/619865001/
Long, T. (2016, February 29). 100 years since Villa attacked Columbus, N.M. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.elpasotimes.com/story/life/2016/02/29/100-years-since-villa-attacked-columbus-nm/80621532/
Main, A. (2014, July 30). The Central American child refugee crisis: made in USA. CEPR.net. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://cepr.net/the-central-american-child-refugee-crisis-made-in-u-s-a/
McCombs, B. (2009, January 30). Border fence averaged $3.9 million per mile. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://tucson.com/news/local/border/border-fence-averaged-million-per-mile/article_5280f4cf-ea3f-527f-8dbe-ed0e3a33d4d4.html
Mihm, S. (2018, April 10). Law says troops can’t be cops. History disagrees. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-04-10/posse-comitatus-law-can-t-stop-trump-from-using-troops-at-border
Miller, T. (2012, June 7). Bringing the battlefield to the border. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://tomdispatch.com/todd-miller-fortress-usa/
Miller, T. (2013, July 11). Creating a military-industrial-immigration complex. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://tomdispatch.com/todd-miller-surveillance-surge-on-the-border/
Miller, T. (2017, December 7). The era of walls. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://tomdispatch.com/todd-miller-the-market-in-walls-is-growing-in-a-warming-world/
Miller, T. (2012, March 7). Strykers on the border. NACLA.org. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://nacla.org/blog/2012/3/7/strykers-border
Nevins, J., & Dunn, T. (2008, October 31). Conflict of a different sort. NACLA.org. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://nacla.org/article/conflict-different-sort
Nevitt, M. (2018, April 4). The military, the Mexican border and Posse Comitatus: four key takeaways. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.justsecurity.org/54529/military-mexican-border-posse-comitatus-key-takeaways/
Nowrasteh, A. (2018, January 22). The dangerous myth about terrorists crossing Mexico border. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.newsweek.com/dangerous-myth-about-terrorists-crossing-mexico-border-787157
PR Newswire. (2014, June 3). Border security market outlook 2014-2024. PRnewswire.com. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/border-security-market-outlook-2014-2024-261679721.html
Samuels, B. (2018, April 4). Trump signs off on memo to send National Guard to southern border. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/381728-trump-signs-off-on-memo-to-send-national-guard-to-southern-border/
Savage, M. (2018, April 7). Richest one percent on target to own two-thirds of all wealth by 2030. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/apr/07/global-inequality-tipping-point-2030
Schmidt, M., & Apuzzo, M. (2014, December 5). U.S. to continue racial, ethnic profiling in border policy. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/06/us/politics/obama-to-impose-racial-profiling-curbs-with-exceptions.html
Smith, D. (2018, April 3). Trump announces plan for U.S. military to guard Mexican border “until we can have a wall”. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/03/trump-wall-military-guard-plans-announced-baltic-press-conference
Southern Border Communities Coalition (SBCC). (n.d.). Fatal encounters with CBP. Southernborder.org. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.southernborder.org/deaths_by_border_patrol
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (2017, September 14). Customs and Border Protection is hiring veterans. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/customs-and-border-protection-hiring-veterans
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (n.d.). About the CBP. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.cbp.gov/about
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (n.d.). CBP’s eyes in the sky. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.cbp.gov/frontline/frontline-november-aerostats
United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2017, March 16). FY 2018 budget in brief. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/DHS%20FY18%20BIB%20Final.pdf
Vallet, E. (2017, July 3). Border walls are ineffective, costly and fatal – but we keep building them. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://theconversation.com/border-walls-are-ineffective-costly-and-fatal-but-we-keep-building-them-80116
Washington, J. (2017, February 16). Disappeared. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.guernicamag.com/disappeared/
Whitehead June 16, J. (2014, June 16). Has the Dept. of Homeland Security become America’s standing army? Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/has_the_dept_of_homeland_security_become_americas_standing_army
Woody, C. (2016, March 16). Narconomics: “the real drugs millionaires are right here in the United States”. Retrieved April 24, 2018, from https://www.businessinsider.com/where-drug-money-goes-2016-3